Tuesday, December 07, 2010

A Real Scrooge

I'm not sure which rock these women are crawling out from under. I sure wish Palin would crawl back under it and close the door behind her. In the past we've been blessed with Sarah's stupid and Michelle's (Bachmann) stupid, among others (my sincerest apologies to those I've left out) and now we get Kate O'Beirne. O'Beirne, of the National Review, recently showed her own personal Ebenezer in the form of an audacious rant against school lunch programs.



Thanks to Crooks and Liars for the footage.

I'd say that the most ridiculous point of her rant is her accusation that parents who rely on school lunch programs to ensure their children have a healthy meal each day are guilty of neglect. We have a real problem with child abuse in this country, and we need to do something about that. But, seriously, not being able to feed your children because you simply cannot afford the food is not abuse, it's reality for way too many American families these days.

I just don’t get why millions of school children qualify for school breakfasts unless we have a major wide spread problem with child neglect.


Let me explain, Kate, millions of school children qualify for school breakfasts (and lunches) because the policies of your party have put their parents out of jobs (not to mention that the GOP's lording over the citizenry have reduced access to birth control and sex education, directly affecting the number of children born into poverty unnecessarily).

Kind of reminds me of another clueless yahoo, Cynthia Davis, remember her? Perhaps these women are so privileged that they don't have to do their own food shopping and preparation. Must be nice to be so ignorant and happy bah humbug to you too.

3 comments:

True Blue Texan said...

Wow. Just wow. As someone who used the free/reduced lunch program and worked in the cafeteria of an elementary school, I can attest that the criteria for qualification is pretty steep. You have to be truly in need to qualify for the free program and part of the working poor to qualify for reduced.

This chick is clueless. The parents that make no effort to send their kids to school with a lunch or the means to purchase one are the ones guilty of neglect. Not the ones getting help.

Sidhe said...

It's amazing, isn't it?

I just don't understand why these people are so opposed to investing in the children who will be the future of our country (if they don't starve to death). We, Americans, go on and on about how great our country is, we should be ashamed that there are people starving while Old Glory waves.

Sidhe said...

Oh, and even more ashamed that these "ladies" insist on speaking publicly...